ЧК SENSATA ASTANA LTD.
This is a company preview
Unlock the full report for 1 check — contacts, bank accounts, court cases, government contracts, arrests, licenses and PDF export.
Risks
0/18Комитет государственных доходов · Государственные закупки РК · АО ФНБ «Самрук-Казына» · АОО «НИШ»This assessment is informational and analytical only, based on our internal methodology and open sources; it is not an official government conclusion or a guarantee of reliability.
Procurement signals
Court cases
Arrests & encumbrances
Enforcement proceedings
Certificates
Licenses and permits
Summary
Министерство юстиции РКActivities
1ОКЭДДеятельность холдинговых компаний
Contacts
Change history
Tax payments
6By year · ₸
| Indicator | 2026 | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tax paid | 76K | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Penalty | 1K | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Fine | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| VAT refund | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Financial statements
PremiumPublic contracts
What it sells and where
Samruk-Kazyna procurement
Tender bids
Procurement as a customer
Assets
Bank accounts
Leadership
1- ММ
Михайлов Максим Александрович
Director
Founders
Accreditations
Employees
Affiliated companies
PremiumDirector's involvement in other legal entities
Branches
Company networks
PremiumSimilar companies
Media mentions
Company summary
ЧК SENSATA ASTANA LTD. (BIN 260440900093) is an active legal entity, registered in 2026, located in Astana. The main line of business is financial intermediation. Small enterprise, headcount: 6 to 10 employees. Automated screening of open registries found no risk indicators for ЧК SENSATA ASTANA LTD.. Head per the registry: Михайлов Максим Александрович. Registry snapshot dated June 11, 2026.
Data sources and disclaimer
Sources: Министерство юстиции РК, Комитет государственных доходов МФ РК, Верховный Суд РК, Портал государственных закупок РК, АО «Самрук-Казына», Бюро национальной статистики РК, Портал электронного лицензирования. Data is collected automatically and may lag behind primary sources; the absence of a record does not guarantee the absence of the fact. This is reference information and does not replace an official extract. Methodology: SafeDeal editorial policy.